(and more M ) when I look at results, there is no difference as they share same sensor. First you have to press the ISO button, then use the thumb dial to scroll to the ISO you want, then finally either press SET or the INFO button to lock it in. As such, the Leica M262 is possibly better seen as a sidestep rather than a step forward in the Leica lineup. Just feels like the marketing department have taken over the machine room, unfortunately. This can make the process of rationalising an upgrade quite difficult, though in my experience once the upgrade is made, it does tend to make a bit more sense. On the other hand, if you do describe your GAS in terms of Leicas, and suggest a Monochrom is the kind of thing you forget in a cupboard, well. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor. It is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. Ultimately, if youre looking for all the bells and whistles, you certainly wont find them on this camera. It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M rangefinder, and the first to use a CMOS type sensor. M240 v. M246 v. M262 v. Monochrom 246. True Leica again (after the M240), pure and sololy focused on the Photography essentials. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come. We think it rises to the challenge. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. November 7, 2013 December 8, 2013 Peter . So, yeah, as I said, video is just not something I want to do with a Leica M camera! The sensor is still not what I would consider great (or even competitive) in regards to dynamic range and high ISO quality, perhaps I was just spoiled by the incredible capabilities of the Nikon Df. This might be the better screen, or it might be residual live-view-denial telling me that the more simple M262 is a better camera for me. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. It depends on your needs. Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. If you want video and live view, get the 240. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being used. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. Be the first. This thing has live-view, and video. To each his own. One review even suggested that the M10 should be called the M11, with the M240 rightfully being the M10. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. Its back to the basics. Keep up the good words! This really piqued my interest. I would say a hidden gem at 2/3 of the price for a used M-10. People get all gnarled up about refresh rates and such, but the M240s EVF is fine for its limited uses.Focus Peaking. Ive turned off the automatic image review and hardly ever needto go through the menu - and for the few times that I do so I appreciate the very simple menu structure so its easy to find what Im after. Im really enjoying this site since discovering it! The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Clear editor. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. The M240 is wide and bulky. Ive decided to sell my Leica M typ 262, so I thought it about time I write a bit of a post about it. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. The Leica M240 has done me proud whilst the M262 has been away, though the experience has not be without a couple of surprises, so I thought Id write a little bit about what Ive found.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_9',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); First off, I should probably say that this isnt going to be a proper review Ive written so many reviews about Leica rangefinder cameras and their subtle differences that the idea of writing my thoughts about every facet of this camera just doesnt appeal at all and thats despite this one having more to offer than any that Ive shot before. The bigger the screen size is, the better the user experience. I have had good luck with Sonys latest fast SD cards, improving this condition quite well. I posted this as a person of experience. M-D, M-P, M240 and M262 photos. Im not trying to justify myself I certainly wouldnt to trolls the point is simply that I spend my money on something I enjoy. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Even though this image set was only intentionally overexposed by a single stop in direct sunlight, the highlights from the image samples taken by the Leica M246 and the Leica M Monochrom were blown and unrecoverable in post processing. I shot film forever and my M2 was my first range finder. With a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most headphones. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. To be fair, about 30 days of the last six months had the Leica in intensive care at Leica New Jersey so this is technically five months with the M262. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Limited to 75 - 35/28mm. The image quality of the Leica M240 is outstanding. Hello. The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. I typically use a 75mm lens on my M 262. A m262 is limited to the lens choice as it rangefinder view only. Size/weight is perfect . The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts: Paid Subscription - 2.99 per month and youll never see an advert again! When it comes to making video, things are different! The M9 was a simple digital rangefinder with limited features and menu options, the M262 has even less in the menu and a slightly improved user interface. I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. On the M240 the highlight from focus peaking is often not apparent at all. Im not sure about the iso dial though, I feel like thats a feature that would really suit me. . Your previous content has been restored. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. You can post now and register later. For me, digital cant create that Portra look, or black and whiteand I really really tried to like the digital Ms, I guess thats where I am different I really enjoy the digital cameras, [] my heart. Image quality will be essentially the same. Having live-view is great and the screen is an improvement but its too big for an M and the files look/feel like something that came out of a Sony. Im an auto-ISO guy so the dial is nice for the little I use it. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. With regards to minimizing my digital camera gear, my thinking was simple. They didn't say it's a different sensor, they said different technology. Interesting article as I picked up a used m240 at Christmas at a good price. I completely agree about the thumb rest, adds more (in a bad way) than removing the screen takes away, in my opinion. There is an M240 feature that can get you there with User Settings, and right now I cant recall how easily accessible that is.In Camera BW filter Simulations. There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. Why torture yourself? 3200-10,000 (I find this to be really handy for indoor family photos, which is essentially the only time I need high ISOs) the larger and brighter viewfinder the size (yes, one can really feel a difference) overall operational responsiveness to a much lesser degree: fewer buttons on the back of the camera, smaller red dot, more matte black finish. Fast continuous shooting is useful for catching action shots. And thats pushing it. Id probably buy a new car. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. A blessing in some ways, though frustratingly its taken the edge off a feature Ive enjoyed more than I expected to. Its been that camera that I know is there and just crack out when it feels right. Quick charge with automatic constant current control prevents battery from overcharging, short circuit, and electronic shock Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. Looking forward to your impressions, cheers! I did, yes I have an M10-P now. Which is the better buy? In the run up to buying an M10 Ive been reading a lot of reviews, and have found the M262 is rarely mentioned in them. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Pasted as rich text. It was the same shape as the M262 I was used to, maybe a touch heavier, but not really noticeably in the hand. Weight is certainly a thing though! A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. The last four images you posted are the best images Ive seen from an M240. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. But the I needed a 21mm for crowd shots and discovered the live view is awesome for this. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. Funny thing that while the M10 launched, I ordered one early 2017 thinking this may be the M I waited for. Help us by suggesting a value. The M240 feels, well, fuller. . Because I only shoot raw, I dont need the white balance settings. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M8 A Year with an Ageing Digital Rangefinder By Rui Hu, Panasonic GM1 Review: A Digital ILC Alternative to the Olympus XA2? These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. I use the 1.4 magnifier with my old 90mm tele-elmarit and an external viewfinder with my voigtlander 21mm f1.4 both work just fine for me. The price is$5195/4050. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. In fact, I likely wouldnt be selling it at all if it werent for the fact that I recently and quite inadvertently gave myself a big chunk of M10 gear acquisition syndrome! Thorsten Overgaard recently posted two comparative X-Rite colorchecker images that show the colour differences between the 262 and 240 which sold me on the 262. I did the same thing Hamish, never having handled the M10. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic modes. Paste as plain text instead, (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. At this point, Leica will probably keep video for its SL series. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. Great article as always! Edit: Since writing this I have been made aware that pressing and holding the ISO button is the quickest way to change ISO. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear.